Username: *
Password: *

Use of the Ink Base?

Alex and Megan have been playing with pipetting arrays of solutions onto the FTO as described in the "Another Printing Option" thread. Megan said that the 5µL and 10 µL drops seem to be taking a long time to dry even in a 60˚ oven. Then it occurred to me...we have been using the metal nitrate solutions made up in the ink base (mostly because that is what we have already made up). If we are not printing, perhaps it would be better to just use aqueous solutions, appropriately acidified?

I realize that the results may not be comparable then to the films printed with the printer, but right now, our printer is not looking too promising (the latest is we can't get it to power up...hoping it just needs some time to dry out after all the unclogging procedures). And as we have only gotten one film to print, imperfectly, we don't even have much to compare to!

And one benefit of abandoning the need for the ink base would be using precursor solutions that one would otherwise be leery of putting through the printer.

Any thoughts on this? Those of you who are trying the pipetting array method, are you using the ink base solutions as well or did you already beat me to the punch?

Cheers,
Maggie

Pipette method

I am sorry I didn't make this clear in my original post. We just started with aqueous solutions but then had problems with the large drops drying unevenly. Therefore I suggested adding some lower volatility solvents to the mixture in hopes of getting more even films. I think the ideal would be if a reproducible gradient ring structure resulted so that each spot would also be an internal thickness study!

Nitrate solutions

We made our metal nitrate solutions in water, and the first substrate is being scanned right now. We'll let you know how it turns out.